Blood On The Hands Of Animal Activists

The Armory of the Revolution blog grew out of my Facebook Notes. I had published 500 articles on Facebook prior to launching the Armory.

Facebook Notes and Armory essays are hit pieces, ammunition in guerilla campaigns. They are not scholarly research presentations, nor are they meant to be.

Facebook and social media sites are not conducive to lengthy, in-depth analyses, voluminous tomes, nor lengthy prognostications, even if by friends.

The most weighty issues are given short shrift in such a venue. To make an impact, and to reach people effectively, one must frame one’s comments, observations, and exhortations in as economic a mode as possible. Oftentimes this does the subject matter a disservice, but in my experience that is the portal to further curiosity, inquiry, and consideration.

My objective is, and has been, the radicalization of the Animal Rights movement. Most animal activists are far too busy saving lives and rescuing animals in distress to concern themselves with such esoteric topics as political philosophy, economics, history, or theories of human and animal liberation.

Early animal activists were mostly comfortable suburbanites, the products of middle class backgrounds and conservative political philosophy. Their experience in political struggles was virtually non-existant, and certainly did not extend to radical social issues of the day, ie, civil rights, integration, and voting rights.

In seeking political support to end the more egregious abuses of animals with which they became familiar, they turned to those with whom they were familiar, their conservative elected officials. The issues that primarily concerned those early activists regarded dogs, cats, and vivisection of laboratory animals.

It should have been immediately apparent to those early activists that they were imploring the enemy for help. Of course, they had no clue.

Even then conservative politicians were firmly in the grasp of Big Pharma and the medical lobby, and concerns about abuse and torture of animals in medical research fell upon deaf ears. Activists were placated with lip service about stray dogs and cats, and they went away feeling they had impacted those in positions to help.

No such help was ever received. But the enactment of the Animal Protection Act in 1966, engineered by Republican Robert Dole and signed into law by Democrat Lyndon Johnson, convinced the rather naive activists that animal issues transcended partisan political agendas, and that the plights of animals, and the solutions to those plights were totally apolitical.

Almost 50 years later the damage done by that misguided notion is only beginning to be recognized.

Since those early years of the animal movement the country has come under the growing influence of Big Business, Wall Street, the Banks, Big Oil, and Big Agriculture. Their power is based upon the politicians whose campaigns they finance and on whom they bestow contributions and gifts. They are rewarded with the passage of legislation they favor and with the appointments of industry insiders and lobbyists to position of authority in agencies regulating those very industries. The result is as predictable as it is pernicious: Industries are running the government, at least insofar as legislation and regulatory oversight is concerned.

And it is just that legislation and oversight which operates against the interests of animals where they conflict with the interests of business.

The result is Big Oil destroying wildlife habitats, Big Pharma is killing millions of laboratory animals each year, Big Ag is opposing any relief to the suffering of animals trapped in the food system, conservative politicians are defending puppy mills, circuses, rodeos, horse racing, dog racing, and aquatic parks, as free enterprise,

Even with the mountain of evidence that conservative politicians are the mouthpieces for business, apologists for the exploitation of animals, and defenders of animal cruelty, there are still animal activists who refuse to look at the evidence and who defend the conservatives’ records.

Fortunately, those activists are advancing in years and giving way to a younger, more politically astute crop of animal defenders and movement leaders.

This next generation of activists is better educated, more liberal,
historically informed, and possessed of worldviews that embrace universal rights and the struggle for both human and animal liberation.

The Animal Rights moment has its dinosaurs: they are older, politically unsophisticated, philosophically adrift, and clutching feverishly to the notion that somehow Republicans and conservative Democrats share their interests. They have to believe it, lest their whole world crumbles around them. They will have been proven to have been wrong for the entirety of their lives.

The Animal Rights movement has continued to lurch forward, from one issue to another, from crisis to crisis, with no direction and little leadership.

Animal activists have been leaving their love for animals at the doors of the polling booths, at best using their votes for ridiculously unimportant issues or, at worst, supporting those actually hostile to animals.

How could they do so? Easily. Guns, or taxes, or gay folks were more of a concern than were animals.

We’ve come a long way since then. But the animal movement is a long way from politically knowledgeable or sophisticated.

Animal activists actually continue to throw away their votes and their influence.

Animal rights is a concern of perhaps 2% of the population. But our troops do not vote as a bloc. We could make the difference in every close race in the country if we did.

Incredibly, animal activists vote about 60-40 for liberals over conservatives.

What that means is that 4 out of 10 animal activists are cancelling out the votes of another 4 in 10 animal activists! Eighty percent of animal activists’ votes are meaningless!

Only 20% of us are heard. It’s as thought the movement were only one-fifth its size.

Stupid. Stupid. Stupid.

Did I mention stupid?

This is caused by animal activists who are political conservatives.

Activists who care more about zygotes than they do about calves, puppies, piglets, or lambs.

Activists who are oblivious to the horrible agenda conservative legislators are following: blocking attempts to end puppy mills, gestation crates, battery cages. Favoring wolf kills, hunting on federal lands, Mustang roundups and horse slaughter, repealing the Endangered Species Act, continuing corporate welfare to Big Agriculture, destroying animal habitats by drilling, fracking, and mining, etc.

Conservatives in the animal movement are less than worthless. They are dangerous, disruptive, counter-productive, and confused.

The Armory blog is here for the sole purpose of providing ammunition to those trying to radicalize the Animal Rights movement. To educate and elucidate. To prod and challenge. To goad and to direct.

And to wake people up.

Bad enough there is blood on the hands of the general public.

It is a tragedy to be on the hands of those who are supposed to be the animals’ friends.


One thought on “Blood On The Hands Of Animal Activists

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.