Why Republicans Defeating Hillary In 2016 Would Be Good For The Long Term

Hillary Clinton

To win the White House in 2016, the Republicans will need over 60% of the white vote and about 40% of the non-white vote.

While such a result is mathematically possible, it is extremely unlikely.

What the Republicans will likely be able to do is continue to control the House of Representatives. That might be possible because in 2010, the Republican controlled legislatures in red states gerrymandered Congressional districts to assure that Republicans elected to Congress would outnumber Democrats even though Democrats would win the majority of votes.

Every 10 years, after the National Census, states re-draw the boundaries of Congressional Districts. Democrats must wait until 2020 to level the playing field. And to do that will require that a full court press is launched to gain statehouses and state legislatures in 2018 and 2020.

That task would be much easier for Democrats were they challenging an incumbent Republican president in 2020 and attacking that same president in the 2018 mid-term elections.

Which, of course would occur if we lost the 2016 presidential campaign.

For liberals that might not be the worst idea.

Hillary is the likely nominee and president in 2016. But Hillary falls far short of an ideal president for most liberals.

She is tied to Wall Street, to Big Business, to the military-industrial complex, to Big Agriculture, and Big Pharma. She supports American belligerence, our interventionist foreign policy, and military adventurism.

Were Hillary to be defeated in 2016 by a Republican, it would set the stage for Democratic successes in 2018 in Congress and statehouses, and for a Democratic challenge in 2020 that could be led by a true liberal Democrat.

The Republican base will have continued to erode. Old white men will have died off in droves, Republican voter suppression schemes will have continued to alienate people of color, and evangelical pressure on Republican legislators to demonize the LGBT community will likely not abate,

A Democratic 2020 strategy to re-draw Congressional districts across the country, if successful, could mean the end of the Republican Party as a national party. At best, it would become a regional Congressional party.

The irony is that it might only be a successful strategy if the Democrats lose the White House in 2016.

If Hillary and the Wall Street Democrats capture the White House next year, it is entirely possible that a Republican challenge to her in 2020 will allow the Republicans to retain control of red state legislatures. Which would mean a continuation of Republican gerrymandering of Congressional districts, which would remain in place until 2030.

On substantive matters of domestic economic policy, foreign affairs, corporate welfare, and corporate campaign financing, Republicans and Wall Street Democrats are indistinguishable.

Both rely on corporate bribery and lobbyists, both have family members on the payrolls of the Big Banks, both appoint corporate lobbyists or executives to regulatory agencies which oversee the very agencies they come from, both appoint Wall Street bankers to Cabinet level positions and as presidential economic advisers.

Both pursue interventionist foreign policy, military belligerence, and international trade agreements. Such trade agreements all subvert American sovereignty, circumvent American labor and environmental laws, and cost American workers jobs and lower wages.

It may well be worth enduring a Republican administration in 2016 for the possibility of sweeping statehouses in 2018 and electing a liberal in 2020.

A hard left turn by Hillary is unlikely. Sanders’ candidacy is forcing Hillary to sound more liberal, but her core being is that of a Wall Street puppet.

The political landscape will be a centrist Democratic Party versus a right wing Republican Party, with a political vacuum on the left.

That vacuum could be filled by liberals taking over the Democrats in the 2020 primaries, or by a coalition of minor parties coming together to form a party of the Left.



Author’s Notes:

I am unaware of any other blog with the Armory’s mission of radicalizing the animal movement. I certainly hope I am not alone, and that there are similar sentiments being expressed by comrades unknown to me.

If you know of other blogs dedicated to animal rights and the defeat of capitalism, please comment with a link.

• Be sure to follow the Armory and share it with your Facebook friends and email contacts, as well as on Twitter, Google, and all other social media platforms. Our influence and effectiveness is dependent upon you!

Natasha Sainsbury, of Good Karma Graphic Design, has joined Armory of the Revolution as Editor, and is responsible for the transformation of the blog’s appearance. Visit and follow her blog V Kind.

If you are not already subscribed to the Armory, please do so before you leave.

There’s a button to Follow us in the upper right sidebar.

• Be sure to visit Armory of the Revolution’s new commissary and bookstore: The Supply Depot

You will find recommended reading on Animal Rights, revolutionary theory, politics, economics, religion, science, and atheism. There is also a section of supplies for animal liberationists, hunt saboteurs, and social revolutionaries. This is all brand new, and we will be adding lots more merchandise in the near future!

Feel free to comment. I encourage open discussion and welcome other opinions. I moderate comments because this blog has been attacked by hunters and right wing trolls. I approve comments that are critical as well as those which agree with me. Comments that I will not tolerate are those that are spam, threatening, disrespectful, or which promote animal abuse and cruelty

If you support the Amory’s work and mission, please help us grow.

Just $3 per month will allow is to advertise!


4 thoughts on “Why Republicans Defeating Hillary In 2016 Would Be Good For The Long Term

  1. This is idiocy. With all three branches of government under their control, Republicans can do real damage, eliminating major social programs such as social security, medicare, and Obamacare, starting wars, rolling back civil rights, eliminating access to birth control.. and filling upcoming Supreme Court vacancies with conservative justices that will keep the court conservative for a generation, making it nearly impossible to overturn Citizens United for decades.


  2. I see any big win 2016 by the Republican faction as disastrous. We can’t afford GOP majority control in either house, nor can we afford a Republican nut in the White House. We’ve been treading disaster since 2000 with ‘gerrymandering’ in a number of states along with the heavy duty immersion of religion into our political system. Attempting to undo egregious legislation once passed into law is difficult because too many in this country are not willing to step out of their non-voting comfort zone, and the electorate is heavily weighted with nut jobs who believe Democracy equates to a reign of terror that must be undone. I don’t want Clinton in 2016 either but she would be preferable to any Republican anarchist. Hopefully Americans will wake up before it is too late but I’m not counting on it. Either climate change will determine the fate of all living things on this earth or Republicans will. Neither is a preferable over the other as a choice but rather a huge detriment to ‘life’ as we know it!

    Liked by 1 person

    • I agree. While the Republicans will likely keep the House, I see them losing the White House and the Senate. The point of the article is that control of the statehouses is critical in 2018 and 2020 to assure fair redistricting.

      The great irony is that it will be more difficult if we win the White House next year.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s