Would The Animals Vote For Your Politician?

animalsvotePoliticians across the spectrum seek the votes of animal activists, some more ardently than others.

Many advocate for higher penalties for animal cruelty, for protecting wildlife, or for opposing horse slaughter.

Is there a litmus test that animal activists can apply to political candidates and political parties that would ensure our votes deliver the most benefit to animals?

Actually, there is such a litmus test,

But it probably is not what you would have expected it to be.

The single greatest enemy of animals, the single greatest cause of animal exploitation, cruelty, and murder is business. Profits, our economic system. Capitalism.


Few candidates for office in the US openly oppose capitalism, Bernie Sanders being the most notable exception.

Which means that almost every candidate for office, at the very least, tacitly supports the slaughter industries.

Hardly an animal-friendly position.


But there is a litmus test which will determine the extent that Wall Street and corporations can continue to control of government.

Public campaign financing.

An end to private political donations, an end to special interest influence in political campaigns, an end to legalized bribery, an end to Wall Street buying politicians, an end to lobbyists pulling the strings of government.

Big Ag, Big Pharma, Big Oil murder billions of animals each year. They do so with taxpayer subsidies, with obstruction to regulation, with industry hacks being appointed to the very regulatory agencies charged with overseeing their very industries.

They do it with bribery.

If there is a single litmus test that would yield legislators who would be helping animals, even if indirectly, it is whether or not they would ban private financing of campaigns.

Public campaign financing is an issue almost exclusively supported by very liberal candidates, and many, if not most, contested elections will not even have a candidate supporting public campaign financing.

Where we cannot apply the litmus test, what should we look for?

The enemy is Wall Street and corporate America. The candidate most critical of the oligarchy would be closer to us than the candidate who takes marching orders from Wall Street.

And one of the most telling positions a candidate can hold is support for, or opposition to, Wall Street’s most important issue: international trade agreements.

The trade agreement du jour is the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP), the agreement engineered by Wall Street and multinational corporations. It is the cornerstone of Obama’s legislative agenda and supported by Republicans and Wall Street Democrats.


The TPP is a twelve nation agreement that must be approved by each nation’s political leadership, and which will affect 40% of the world’s trade. It is a giveaway to multinational corporations, supersedes environmental and labor laws, is enforceable in corporate tribunals, and guarantees that impoverished nations will continue to be exploited by capitalist criminals.


Bernie Sanders, on the American political left, and Donald Trump, of the American political right, have been fighting to stop the TPP.

It must still be approved the Congress, and will come to a vote while Obama is still in office.

Hillary Clinton was involved in the early negotiations for the TPP, and was highly supportive as Secretary of State.

She has been hammered by Bernie Sanders on the TPP for months. She repeatedly refused to take a position as a candidate for president.

Hillary Clinton has a record as a Wall Street Democrat, and her positions and fund raising sources amply justify that appellation.

Now it looks like Hillary has grown a spine! She’s crossed swords with Wall Street and the multinational corporations which engineered the Trans Pacific Partnership.

Whether she is merely posturing because of pressure from Sanders on the left or the prospect of Biden on the right will become clear when Congress votes on the TPP. Will she put her prestige and campaign on the line to get Congress to defeat the TPP or will she stay on the sidelines and let the cards fall where they may?

Is she hoping Obama gets it passed before she assumes office?

Sanders and Trump will be fighting the TPP. I hope Hillary will, too.

For animal activists, the TPP is one of the most revealing positions a candidate for office can hold.

Simply put, a vote for the TPP is a vote against animals.

 

Author’s Notes:

I am unaware of any other blog with the Armory’s mission of radicalizing the animal movement. I certainly hope I am not alone, and that there are similar sentiments being expressed by comrades unknown to me.

If you know of other blogs dedicated to animal rights and the defeat of capitalism, please comment with a link.

• Be sure to follow the Armory and share it with your Facebook friends and email contacts, as well as on Twitter, Google, and all other social media platforms. Our influence and effectiveness is dependent upon you!

Natasha Sainsbury, of Good Karma Graphic Design, has joined Armory of the Revolution as Editor, and is responsible for the transformation of the blog’s appearance. Visit and follow her blog V Kind.

If you are not already subscribed to the Armory, please do so before you leave.

There’s a button to Follow us in the upper right sidebar.

• Be sure to visit Armory of the Revolution’s new commissary and bookstore: The Supply Depot

You will find recommended reading on Animal Rights, revolutionary theory, politics, economics, religion, science, and atheism. There is also a section of supplies for animal liberationists, hunt saboteurs, and social revolutionaries. This is all brand new, and we will be adding lots more merchandise in the near future!

Feel free to comment. I encourage open discussion and welcome other opinions. I moderate comments because this blog has been attacked by hunters and right wing trolls. I approve comments that are critical as well as those which agree with me. Comments that I will not tolerate are those that are spam, threatening, disrespectful, or which promote animal abuse and cruelty.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Would The Animals Vote For Your Politician?

  1. Pingback: Would The Animals Vote For Your Politician? | thisveganlife

  2. I would hold my nose and vote for Bernie Sanders, not because I like or respect the man or expect him to do anything for animals but because “the enemy of my enemy is my ally”; and most of the people I consider enemies hate the thought of a man like Sanders in power. But if I were a wild animal I’m not sure I could support any candidate who voted for the “Bipartisan Sportsmen’s Act” and who has been as vocal a supporter of hunting as has been Sanders. The aforementioned Congressional bill is a veritable Pandora’s box of bad policies that will have a devastating impact on wildlife. It enjoys widespread, bipartisan support from politicians who see it as an easy, no-cost way of pandering to the hunting mafia in this country. In my estimation, how a congressman comes down on that piece of legislation is the real litmus test of whether they qualify as a decent human being worthy of support.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I suspect, given the alternatives, that the animals would. Bernie Sanders does have a 100% positive rating from the Humane Society of the United States for his pro-animal voting record. He has a positive record on
    wildlife (aside from the hunting issue), on endangered species, and on the treatment of farm animals. However, he would be fighting the same lobbyists from the NRA, International Safari Club, and multiple regional hunting groups, along with the agricultural lobby that supports ranchers. So much for wildlife and endangered species. Big Agriculture will throw its vast resources against any laws or regulations that would inhibit their “standard agricultural practice” abuse and reduce their profits. I don’t see the end of halal, gestation crates, or battery cages. do not see anything now that promises a support of veganism from Sanders himself.

    But if the animals voted for Sanders, and if I voted for Sanders, would it help? One problem is the issue of semantics/definition, and fine points usually don’t win elections. Sanders refers to himself as a democratic socialist. Yet that label usually refers to a political system that is democratic but an economic system that is socialist. In the recent debate when asked about his views on capitalism, he said he was not a “casino capitalist,” not that he abjured capitalism itself. He has also referred to Europe as a model, so maybe socialist democracy is more specifically what he advocates. However, if he should become the nominee, I don’t think it would make much difference in the general election. When people hear the work “socialism” it seems to evoke the idea of socialism = communism = Soviet Union = bad. If he explains that he would like America to moved toward the European model with more government intervention, less economic inequality, and a bigger social safety net, the suggestion of “redistribution” and “welfare” would turn conservatives off anyway.

    But even if Sanders were elected, he would not be a czar. He would still need Congress to support his policies, and I suspect he would have at least as much trouble as Obama has had. Big Business would still be supporting the candidates with the funding they need for their next reelection and fueling K Street to get the votes it wants. There just aren’t enough of us to get animals off the bottom of the list of concerns.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s