Republican Bedwetters


Critics of the Republican field of presidential candidates are warning that their calls for banning refugees smacks of fascism.

The critics do not know what they are talking about.

The US is already a fascist state.

Fascism does not mean stiff-arm salutes, brown shirts, or hobnail boots. It doesn’t mean cattle cars, labor camps, or death squads. It means that the government is controlled by corporations. Fascism is the merger of state and corporate power.

Some fascist states are kinder than others. Some treat minorities better than  others. Some more oppressive then others. But all are in service to multinational corporations, all place capitalism above compassion, the plutocrats over the people.

The Republican feeding frenzy on the misfortunes of Syrian refugees fleeing terrorism and being bombed by their own government is demagoguery at its basest level.

It is reminiscent of the cowardly action of FDR in denying asylum to Jewish refugees fleeing the Nazis, many of whom were interned and gassed in Auschwitz when they were forced to return to France in 1942.

That the Republican base is afraid of grandmothers and toddlers is understandable. Most Republicans are not too bright and are easily frightened. Both the Republican base and the presidential candidates are acting like children afraid of monsters under their beds. They are more terrified of “things that go bump in the night” than they are supportive of the US Constitution, human rights, or simple human kindness. Like children, they wet themselves in fear instead of processing information like adults.

The clown car full of candidates for president seeking the votes of the rather dim Republican primary voters know exactly what they are doing. They are fanning the flames of bigotry, ignorance, and hatred into a conflagration they hope will carry them into the White House.

And the fascists running the Democratic Party are hoping that rank-and-file Democrats are sufficiently appalled by the Republican rhetoric that we will be good little automatons and rush to vote for Hillary.

A choice between a Republican and Hillary is a choice between a fascist bedwetter and a fascist non-bedwetter.

Not much of a choice, as we will be under the thumb of Wall Street and corporate America in either case.



Author’s Notes:

I am unaware of any other blog with the Armory’s mission of radicalizing the animal movement. I certainly hope I am not alone, and that there are similar sentiments being expressed by comrades unknown to me.

If you know of other blogs dedicated to animal rights and the defeat of capitalism, please comment with a link.

• Be sure to follow the Armory and share it with your Facebook friends and email contacts, as well as on Twitter, Google, and all other social media platforms. Our influence and effectiveness is dependent upon you!

Natasha Sainsbury, of Good Karma Graphic Design, has joined Armory of the Revolution as Editor, and is responsible for the transformation of the blog’s appearance. Visit and follow her blog V Kind.

If you are not already subscribed to the Armory, please do so before you leave.

There’s a button to Follow us in the upper right sidebar.

• Be sure to visit Armory of the Revolution’s new commissary and bookstore: The Supply Depot

You will find recommended reading on Animal Rights, revolutionary theory, politics, economics, religion, science, and atheism. There is also a section of supplies for animal liberationists, hunt saboteurs, and social revolutionaries. This is all brand new, and we will be adding lots more merchandise in the near future!

Feel free to comment. I encourage open discussion and welcome other opinions. I moderate comments because this blog has been attacked by hunters and right wing trolls. I approve comments that are critical as well as those which agree with me. Comments that I will not tolerate are those that are spam, threatening, disrespectful, or which promote animal abuse and cruelty.


3 thoughts on “Republican Bedwetters

  1. I prefer a DEMOCRAT, or Bernie Sanders, for the idiots who continue to scream that he isn’t a Democrat or even Hillary. IT DOES NOT MATTER WHO. Any Democrat will appoint better Supreme Court Justices than the very best person who could be elected out of the bunch of GOP candidates.
    Stop bad mouthing Hillary. If she is the Democratic Nominee, vote for her. There will be at least 2, more likely 3 or even 4 Supreme Court seats up for appointment in the next 4 or 8 years. I do NOT want appointments in the mold of Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and Alito.


    • Hillary Clinton is a Wall Street Democrat.

      Her record as an advocate of Bill Clinton’s policies, her record as a US Senator, and her record as Secretary of State under Obama all bear testimony to her true political colors and philosophical leanings.

      She supported NAFTA. She supported federal mandatory minimum sentencing, supported Bill’s massive prison construction projects, and supported the Defense of Marriage Act which allowed states to ban marriage equality.
      She pandered to the Jewish vote in New York with her votes to invade Iraq and for the fascist Patriot Act.
      She took political bribes from the big banks, Wall Street, Monsanto.
      As Secretary of State she laid the groundwork for the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) and until last month, considered it the “gold standard” of trade agreements.
      She was part of the ill fated decision making process that had the US murdering civilians in the Middle East with our outrageous CIA drone strikes, with the destabilizing of Libya and Syria, protecting Saudi Arabia and squandering billions of dollars in military expenditures and aid, all lining the pockets of US arms manufacturers and defense contractors.
      She proudly referred to herself as a “centrist” until “feeling the Bern.”

      Now that Sanders has created a groundswell of support on the Democratic left, Hillary is redefining herself as a progressive and moving sharply left in her public pronouncements. She has come out against Keystone XL, the Trans Pacific Partnership, in favor of some unspecified Wall Street “reform.”

      Even so, the nomination of Hillary Clinton as the Democratic standard bearer and her election to the presidency would accomplish absolutely nothing in terms of enacting any of the progressive positions she now espouses, even if she has actually had a change of heart and is now a progressive at heart (a questionable proposition to most progressives).

      That is because neither a President Clinton nor a President Sanders will be able to pursue a legislative agenda. While the Democrats will likely retake the US Senate, the House of Representatives will remain in the hands of Republicans. It will be four years of gridlock regardless of whom is elected.

      The Republicans control the House because in 2010 they controlled enough statehouses to gerrymander congressional seats during reapportionment following the Census. The result is that more Republicans were sent to Washington as Members of Congress even though in the total vote for Congress, Democrats out polled Republicans.

      Democrats won’t be able to undo the Republican gerrymandering until 2020.

      The fight for the future of the political parties will be in the 2018 and 2020 campaigns.

      If Democrats can re-take enough statehouses to redraw congressional districts fairly, the Republican Party will be finished as a national political party, and will be mere a regional right wing party, reduced to a few red states.

      The Democratic Party will control both the House and the Senate until at least 2030, perhaps for a generation.

      Which Democratic Party will show up for the 2020 elections? Will it be a tired and frustrated party attempting to defend an abysmal Clinton presidency? Will it be a party led by Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren? Will it be an energized and dynamic party turning out to defeat a right wing incumbent?

      The least successful scenario would be Democrats defending Clinton. It is difficult to envisage any such effort enthusing the Democratic rank-and-file to the degree necessary to impact state legislative races.

      A Sanders presidency, however, would have been building toward a political revolution for his entire presidency, building constituencies far beyond those capable of being built by traditional Democratic operatives.

      The likelihood, of course, is that Sanders will neither win the Democratic nomination nor be elected president. That is primarily due to the fact that almost the entire leadership of the Democratic Party is beholden to Wall Street, special interests, and has been bribed over the years by corporate interests and lobbyists. Sanders would end the the influence of such Democrats and end their careers.

      Clinton and the establishment Democrats hope to appeal to progressives in the primaries and count on their unquestioned support in the general election, holding out the frightening prospect of a right wing Republican president as the reason to unify around Hillary.

      The problem with that for progressives is that we will end up with Wall Street Democrats continuing to control the Democratic Party.

      The Republicans and the Wall Street Democrats differ on social issues, but are in total agreement when it comes to capitalism and to corporate control of government.

      In recent years Reagan, Pappy Bush, Clinton, W, and Obama all appointed industry lobbyists and executives to Departments and regulatory agencies that were responsible for overseeing the very industries the appointees came from.

      There is a revolving door for bankers to go to Treasury, Big Ag hacks to be appointed to Agriculture and Interior, Wall Street insiders go to Commerce and Labor, Big Pharma lobbyists to the FDA, etc.

      No matter who is president, corporate America runs the country.

      Hillary Clinton will continue the policy of corporate control of government.

      So what is the benefit to progressives of a President Hillary Clinton?

      The argument that is compelling is that she would appoint better justices and judges than would a Republican.

      But even that is hardly justification for throwing away the opportunity to turn the Democratic Party into a democratic socialist party.

      With Wall Street Democrats like Hillary, the Democratic Party supports the death penalty. Opposes marijuana legalization. Opposes public financing of campaigns. Opposes GMO labeling.

      With Sanders, the opposite will be true of the Democratic Party.

      And that is exactly why progressives should work to defeat Hillary Clinton, both in the Democratic primaries and in the general election if she is nominated.

      If Hillary and the establishment Democrats are defeated, Sanders, Warren, Grayson, and other true progressives will be able to lead the party into the future as a true leftist party.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.