Donald Trump Has Redefined the Republican Party

TRUMP

Until the Donald, the GOP was the party of free trade agreements, military adventurism, cutting capital gains taxes, corporate welfare, tax loopholes, trickle-down economics, super pacs, and lobbyist influence in campaigns and government.

No more.

Trump has ignored establishment orthodoxy and repudiated establishment priorities.

Trump has been able to take his message condemning military intervention and perpetual war to the people without the need to raise campaign money from the arms manufacturers, munitions lobbyists, warship builders, and the aircraft industry.

Trump has been able to fight trade agreements like NAFTA and the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) because he does not need bribes from multinational corporations, Wall Street, and banking lobbyists.

Trump is too rich to be bribed and doesn’t need to steal.

His populist, anti-establishment message is resonating with a growing segment of the American public.

Should Donald Trump be defeated in November, it is more than likely the Republican party will return to being a wholly owned subsidiary of Big Business and billionaires. But if he is elected, the Republican party will become a populist party, free of the control of right wing ideology and corporate bank accounts.

For years, middle class, lower income, and poor Republicans have voted against their own economic interests, because their social values have been held hostage to the interests of billionaires and Wall Street. Doctrinaire conservatives extorted support from evangelicals, anti-abortionists, gun nuts, and bigots with their checkbooks.

“You want your conservative social issues advanced? You need to vote for our guy!”

The Donald trumped that political norm.

Trump is appealing to a populist base that is distinguishable from the populist left only on social issues. And Trump is far more attractive to blue collar Democrats and left wing populists than is Hillary Clinton.

Hillary supports trade agreements. Trump does not.
Hillary supports military interventionism. Trump does not.
Hillary supports corporate welfare. Trump does not.

For readers of this blog, animal issues are of paramount importance.

Hillary supports the positions of the Obama administration, and has made her lock-step embrace of Obama’s policies central to her campaign to secure the allegiances of African American voters.

But Obama’s policies regarding animals has been abysmal. Obama has continued the brutal wild horse roundups of the Bush administration. Under Obama the Department of Agriculture’s Wildlife Services agency acts as a wholly owned subsidiary of the cattle industry and murders millions of wild animals each year that are seen as inconvenient to cattle ranchers.

Armory of the Revolution will be launching a campaign to convince the Democratic nominee to pledge to end wild horse roundups and to abolish Wildlife Services, the Department of Agriculture agency which kills millions of wild animals annually for the cattle industry.

If Bernie is the nominee, I am confident he would take such positions. If Hillary is the nominee I have grave reservations that she will.

Our campaign will urge animal activists to vote Republican if Hillary refuses to take those pro-animal positions.

On balance, if Hillary refuses to end wild horse roundups and abolish Wildlife Services, we would need to judge Trump vs Clinton on what the effect of their stated policies would be. That analysis breaks in favor of Trump. Trump’s position in opposition to trade agreements, which take a devastating toll on both wildlife and animals trapped in the food system, is much more animal friendly than is Hillary’s support of the Obama war on wildlife.

 

 

Author’s Notes:

I am unaware of any other blog with the Armory’s mission of radicalizing the animal movement. I certainly hope I am not alone, and that there are similar sentiments being expressed by comrades unknown to me.

If you know of other blogs dedicated to animal rights and the defeat of capitalism, please comment with a link.

• Be sure to follow the Armory and share it with your Facebook friends and email contacts, as well as on Twitter, Google, and all other social media platforms. Our influence and effectiveness is dependent upon you!

Natasha Sainsbury, of Good Karma Graphic Design, has joined Armory of the Revolution as Editor, and is responsible for the transformation of the blog’s appearance. Visit and follow her blog V Kind.

If you are not already subscribed to the Armory, please do so before you leave.

There’s a button to Follow us in the upper right sidebar.

• Be sure to visit Armory of the Revolution’s new commissary and bookstore: The Supply Depot

You will find recommended reading on Animal Rights, revolutionary theory, politics, economics, religion, science, and atheism. There is also a section of supplies for animal liberationists, hunt saboteurs, and social revolutionaries. This is all brand new, and we will be adding lots more merchandise in the near future!

Feel free to comment. I encourage open discussion and welcome other opinions. I moderate comments because this blog has been attacked by hunters and right wing trolls. I approve comments that are critical as well as those which agree with me. Comments that I will not tolerate are those that are spam, threatening, disrespectful, or which promote animal abuse and cruelty

If you support the Amory’s work and mission, please help us grow.

Just $3 per month will allow is to advertise!

donate2

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Donald Trump Has Redefined the Republican Party

  1. I doubt if Trump will be elected or would be a good president, but we should pay attention. Trump seems like the karma of the elite conservatives and the symptom of a system gone wrong. He has thrown over the political correctness that made it impossible to even discuss topics like illegal immigration without name calling. He is reaching workers whose production lines are gone, whose looms are quiet, whose farms have been taken over by Big Ag, and whose information processing has been sent to India. The clueless keep talking about achieving the American dream without realizing it died some time ago for those left behind, some as long ago as the Reagan recession. Many of Trump followers believe in a zero sum game. They fight harder but get less. And they’re mad as hell.

    Like

    • While I admire Robert Reich, I think his area of expertise remains in economic matters. Accusing Donald Trump of being a fascist is both juvenile and disingenuous. There are no parallels that warrant the charge and Reich’s article appears to be nothing more than pandering to his liberal base.

      Trump is a populist. He could be fairly compared to George Wallace, or even to Huey Long, but it is patently ridiculous to suggest that his vehement opposition to trade policies and corporate lobbyists somehow smacks of fascism.

      Like

  2. But, Vincent, there IS a major problem with Trump – that guy happens to be a delusional, raving, racist lunatic, that couldn’t care less for animal or human lifes equally. He might be against those “trade agreements” NOW, if only because of potentially detrimental effects on HIS business attempts – which means that he will EMBRACE those same treaties if he can profit from them. So, while he maybe really will revoke already signed agreements, once elected president, you can’t RELY on that. And he is just as likely to lift ALL protections for endangered species with one stroke of his presidential pen, as he is capable of plunging the entire world into bloody chaos. Trump is NOT an alternative to ANYTHING. He is the madman attempting to run the asylum.

    Like

    • The animals have nothing to lose with a Trump presidency. The way things are now for the animals is an Eternal Treblinka. And it is possible that we can convince Hillary to end roundups and Wildlife Service. Hell, it is even possible Bernie wins the nomination. But if he doesn’t win the nomination and she doesn’t pledge to end roundups and Wildlife Services, I will knock on doors for Trump.

      Perhaps the most compelling arguments for electing Trump, beyond the marginal advantage for the animals, are that a Trump presidency would likely allow Democratic statehouse victories in 2018 and 2020 (allowing Democrats to control congressional reapportionment) and that a Hillary defeat will afford progressives the opportunity to take control of the Democratic party from the ashes of a failed Hillary candidacy.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s