Political Pundits Still Have No Clue. But they Still keep Talking.

The-Talking-HeadsThe over-paid, over-appreciated, under-achieving, and by and large clueless political analysts are filling the airwaves with the re-hashed drivel they have been spewing for over a year.

Not one of the supposed political experts saw Bernie or Trump coming.

Trump was dismissed as a joke, Bernie as an unelectable socialist.

The media talking heads ignored Bernie, ridiculed and disparaged Trump.

Having had monumentally misread the voters in the primaries, the same political geniuses are now weighing in on the likely match-up between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton.

We are besieged nightly with computer graphics, pie charts, polls and electoral maps all being read to predict the downfall of Donald Trump. While acknowledging that Hillary Clinton has abysmal favorability ratings, we are quickly told that Trump’s are worse, and are reminded that he is upside down with major constituencies such as women, African Americans, Hispanics, etc.

But none of that analysis explains why Trump is leading with independent voters, and that he is within a few points of Hillary in the media’s own polling.

Just as the professional pundits were wrong about Trump’s campaign folding each coming week, they are without a clue to the dynamics of Trump’s support.

They assume that Trump’s misstatements, braggadocio. frequent corrections, inaccuracies, etc, will erode his support.

Trump voters are pissed off. They want to clean house in Washington. They repudiate the political establishment. They do not give a damn about the specifics of how Trump will govern, they just want someone other than an establishment politician to do so.

Media talking heads and political pundits seem to be trying to assure one another that they are still relevant. That their opinions carry weight. That their perception of political reality is actually true. That their bosses are not pissing away money paying their salaries.

A perfect example of this mutual masturbation was in evidence recently on MSNBC. Chris Hayes was interviewing a Republican operative who was involved in Rudy Giuliani’s aborted Senate campaign against Hillary in 2000. The topic of discussion were polling and focus groups that dissuaded Giuliani from waging a campaign attacking Hillary based upon Bill’s sexual indiscretions while president.

This anecdotal information was then extrapolated to pronounce Trump’s current attacks on Hillary to be of no effect, and quite likely to actually help her!

Not the slightest mention was made of the drastic differences in public attitude toward the establishment and establishment politicians, no analysis of the economic crisis that since visited the country, no discussion of Hillary’s abysmal popularity numbers, no mention of her changing her positions on the Iraq war, universal healthcare, gay rights, private prisons, or the War on Drugs.

Quite satisfied with this dog-and-pony show, Hayes left his audience under the impression that the Trump campaign was destined to fail.

Such orchestrated and worthless dialogue is frequently the content of MSNBC, CNN, and other outlets, invariably framed to place Trump in the dimmest light possible, and extolling Hillary as a beacon of reason in a sea of political confusion. Mainstream media spokespersons are loathe to mention anything about Hillary’s positions on war, trade, foreign policy, universal healthcare, corporate welfare, etc.

Missing in any discussion I have seen is any sense of reality as to what unapproval ratings mean. There is no question that both Trump and Hillary are both under water in their approval vs unapproval ratings.

But just what constitutes “unapproval” of a candidate?

In Hillary’s case, unapproval translates into her being untrustworthy. People do not trust her, and they think she cannot be trusted.

In Trump’s case, most of his unapproval is correctable or of marginal importance. Much of the criticism can be addressed by changes in Trump’s public persona and temperament.

But Hillary cannot fix not being trusted.

And what may be the biggest blow to her trustworthiness yet was this week’s announcement by the Inspector General of the Department of State that Hillary broke federal rules in setting up and using a private email server while serving as Secretary of State.

The Inspector General faulted her for not cooperating in his investigation, refusing to be interviewed, and for not seeking permission to set up the private email server.

This all militates against her credibility, as she has said repeatedly that what she did was approved by the State Department, and that she would cooperate fully in the investigation.

Hillary Clinton is her own worst enemy. She presumes herself entitled to be president. She seems to believe that rules and laws are beneath her concern. She changes her positions like a political windsock. She refuses to acknowledge her errors or apologize for her behaviors. And she hunkers down when caught in lies or misrepresentations, hoping they will dissipate in the next news cycle.

American voters, by-and-large, are fed up with Hillary, fed up with the establishment, fed up with politics as usual.

Donald Trump will very likely be the next president.

And if he is, it will benefit progressives in the Democratic party. Bernie will be the loudest, most respected voice in the party and he will be able to pursue his political revolution without hindrance from Hillary and her conservative cohorts.

Donald Trump will be the best thing that has happened for progressive values and progressive politics in America save for Bernie Sanders himself.



Author’s Notes:.

I am unaware of any other blog with the Armory’s mission of radicalizing the animal movement. I certainly hope I am not alone, and that there are similar sentiments being expressed by comrades unknown to me.

If you know of other blogs dedicated to animal rights and the defeat of capitalism, please comment with a link.

• Be sure to follow the Armory and share it with your Facebook friends and email contacts, as well as on Twitter, Google, and all other social media platforms. Our influence and effectiveness is dependent upon you!

Natasha Sainsbury, of Good Karma Graphic Design, has joined Armory of the Revolution as Editor, and is responsible for the transformation of the blog’s appearance. Visit and follow her blog V Kind.

If you are not already subscribed to the Armory, please do so before you leave.

There’s a button to Follow us in the upper right sidebar.

• Be sure to visit Armory of the Revolution’s new commissary and bookstore: The Supply Depot

You will find recommended reading on Animal Rights, revolutionary theory, politics, economics, religion, science, and atheism. There is also a section of supplies for animal liberationists, hunt saboteurs, and social revolutionaries. This is all brand new, and we will be adding lots more merchandise in the near future!

Feel free to comment. I encourage open discussion and welcome other opinions. I moderate comments because this blog has been attacked by hunters and right wing trolls. I approve comments that are critical as well as those which agree with me. Comments that I will not tolerate are those that are spam, threatening, disrespectful, or which promote animal abuse and cruelty

If you support the Amory’s work and mission, please help us grow.

Just $3 per month will allow is to advertise!





One thought on “Political Pundits Still Have No Clue. But they Still keep Talking.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s