The Best Political Strategy for Animal Activists is Also the Best Strategy for Progressive Democrats


There has not been a significant piece of pro-animal legislation since the Animal Protection Act was adopted 50 years ago.


Because the industries that exploit, enslave, and murder animals own Congress.

Members of Congress and Senators have been bribed with campaign donations and gifts. They represent Big Ag and Big Pharma, not the voters who elected them.

We fully expect the Republicans to place profits above animals. They are proud, unapologetic capitalists.

That the Democrats, supposedly a party of compassion and social justice, are selling out the animals for their 30 pieces of silver makes them the animals’ greater enemy.

The goal of progressives is to defeat corporate Democrats.

As animal activists, our task is to defeat any Democrat who accepts bribes from the slaughter and vivisection industries.

Such a strategy dovetails perfectly with the goals of Bernie Sanders’ progressive wing of the Democratic party in primaries that will occur in 2018 and 2020

Animal activists should take the strategy a step further and vote to defeat any corporate Democrats in the generals.




Armory Notes:

I am unaware of any other blog with the Armory’s mission of radicalizing the animal movement. I certainly hope I am not alone, and that there are similar sentiments being expressed by comrades unknown to me.

If you know of other blogs dedicated to animal rights and the defeat of capitalism, please comment with a link.

• Be sure to follow the Armory and share it with your Facebook friends and email contacts, as well as on Twitter, Google, and all other social media platforms. Our influence and effectiveness is dependent upon you!

Natasha Sainsbury, of Good Karma Graphic Design, has joined Armory of the Revolution as Editor, and is responsible for the transformation of the blog’s appearance. Visit and follow her blog V Kind.

If you are not already subscribed to the Armory, please do so before you leave.

There’s a button to Follow us in the upper right sidebar.

• Be sure to visit Armory of the Revolution’s new commissary and bookstore: The Supply Depot

You will find recommended reading on Animal Rights, revolutionary theory, politics, economics, religion, science, and atheism. There is also a section of supplies for animal liberationists, hunt saboteurs, and social revolutionaries. This is all brand new, and we will be adding lots more merchandise in the near future!

Feel free to comment. I encourage open discussion and welcome other opinions. I moderate comments because this blog has been attacked by hunters and right wing trolls. I approve comments that are critical as well as those which agree with me. Comments that I will not tolerate are those that are spam, threatening, disrespectful, or which promote animal abuse and cruelty

If you support the Amory’s work and mission, please help us grow.

Just $3 per month will allow is to advertise!



9 thoughts on “The Best Political Strategy for Animal Activists is Also the Best Strategy for Progressive Democrats

  1. When it comes to animal welfare issues there is very little difference between democrats and republicans, they are all the same assholes. For eight years the environmental organizations like NRDC and Greenpeace took donations from concerned activists just to send petitions to 0bama every time they needed something. In the meantime, 0bama allowed rounding up of wild horses and open season on animals in wildlife refuges. He and his liberals were too busy protecting petty criminals and worry about gender rights for public bathrooms and same sex marriage and free everything for the welfare tribes, to give a shit about animal welfare issue. If you ask me, they may have given the okay to open season on animals as a bargaining chip. Politicians are all despicable ugly assholes, from top to bottom from left to right!

    Liked by 2 people

    • The reason politicians are always voting to harm animals is because they are bribed to do so by Big Ag and Big Pharma, etc. Only the left wing of the Democratic party opposes private money in politics. And if they vote as they believe, and we animal activists vote against those who vote against animals, there could be a political revolution in this country that would actually mean a change in animal protection legislation and political priorities for the animals.

      Liked by 1 person

      • The problem is, there just aren’t enough politicians who care enough about animal welfare issues, to take on an active role supporting those issues, especially when it comes to wildlife. The perfect example is Bernie Sanders, he is supposed to be the answer for all the ills we are suffering and yet the hunting season on black bears just started in his state. I don’t know maybe he doesn’t have the authority to stop that at local level, or maybe he just doesn’t give a shit.

        The way I see it the situation on the dark side, in states like Idaho where citizens take selfies with a trapped animal bleeding to death slowly, the situation for animals is bleak all year round. In the rest of the country, the animals just need to be lucky to dodge bullets and avoid traps, just during the hunting days, weeks and months. And all the killers, of course, are very philosophical about their killing habits and love and respect their victims.


    • Amen. As I keep noting, animals can’t vote, donate, or protest on their own behalf. There aren’t enough activists or enough activists with deep pockets to bribe (lobby) legislators.

      And, yes, some environmental groups have sold out big time. In his book “Eating Apes” Dale Peterson tells about a beautiful table in one of WWF’s offices in Africa. When he inspected the flowery artwork more carefully, he discovered it was made up of thousands of butterfly wings. WWF also approved of “sustainable” logging that reduced habitat and allowed roads to be built that made it easier for bushmeat hunters to get into the forest. When conservation groups get friendly with exploiters and corporations, they are more interested in money and memberships than in their mission.

      Liked by 2 people

      • You are right. I know about WWF’s sustainable logging, they basically showed the Brazil government how to destroy the forest with less effort and expense.


  2. Another great piece. Thank you.
    My take: unless somehow we can stop the bribes from ag/oil/etc., nothing will happen. And i see no feasible strategy to stop the bribes. Also, while I would have voted fro Sanders, his strong endorsement for Clinton shows he is still just a part of the corrupt Democrats.

    Liked by 1 person

    • We forget the political landscape of 2015 and the years before.

      We forget that there was no champion for progressives, no leader speaking to the dismal record of the Obama administration, no leader advocating for universal healthcare, no leader demanding a living minimum wage, no leader calling out Wall Street and the banks for owning the federal government, no one leading a charge against fracking, Arctic drilling, Big Oil pipelines, or taxpayer subsidies to the oil industry,

      The Democratic establishment had already crowned Hillary as president-in-waiting. Obama was going to see a third term of Monsanto, Goldman Sachs, and Wall Street hacks running the next administration.

      A number of progressive Democrats implored Elizabeth Warren to run. When she blew us off we turned to Bernie Sanders.

      Bernie electrified the left! He articulated so many of the issues that mattered to us. The progressive movement exploded!

      Bernie, of course, is not perfect. He doesn’t connect all the dots on the left, but no one does. I find him weak on animal issues and much less a dove than I would have him be. Others take issue with his support for Israel, still others his support of the dairy industry and arms manufacturers.

      But Bernie was, and is, the only national leader hostile to the oligarchy that controls the Democratic party.

      And Bernie took the fight to them in the 2016 primaries.

      Bernie captured the hearts, imaginations, and votes, of millions.

      Few of them as knowledgeable, as motivated, or as sophisticated as the progressive activists who populate online forums, Facebook groups, or who read this blog. Of the millions who supported Bernie in the Democratic primaries, only a relative handful handful bailed on him and voted Green when he endorsed Hillary. A great many more progressives actually voted for Trump.

      Most everyone who supported Bernie in the 2016 Democratic primaries is on-board for a Bernie run in 2020.

      But we are all over the block on how he should proceed.

      There are those of us who believe our future lies with the Green party. There are those who think Bernie Sanders should launch a Peoples’ party, and are busy petitioning him to do so. Most progressives are in Bernie Sanders’ camp, intent upon reforming the Democratic party.

      Some on the left are so frustrated that Bernie supported Hillary that they fail to analyze the big picture. They also delude themselves that a groundswell of equally frustrated Democrats will flow into a third party. The patent absurdity of that happening was amply demonstrated by Jill Stein’s pitiful performance in November.

      Selling a third party to American voters is no different than selling tires, cereal or creamed corn. To get consumers to purchase an unknown brand requires substantial marketing and advertising campaigns. Branding a political party is even more difficult than branding a product, as promotions and incentives are impossible to offer.

      Those promoting the Greens or a People’s party ignore the most basic political truism: It would require the expenditure of billions upon billions of dollars to sufficiently brand the Greens or another third party to effectively make them a viable political alternative to the Democrats and Republicans.

      Sanders believes the future of the progressive movement lies within the Democratic party.

      I was one of his harshest critics when he endorsed the Whore of Wall Street. Like many Berners I hoped Bernie would run as a Green and challenge the two war and Wall Street parties.

      In retrospect, Bernie made the right call. He would have lost as a Green. Trump would still have been elected president. But progressives would have been shut out of the Democratic party. The movement would have become marginalized. Bernie and his followers would have become as irrelevant as Jill Stein and the Greens are now.

      Bernie was playing the long game. He must have been terrified that Hillary might have won. Had she, progressives would have also been shut out of the process, marginalized within the Democratic party, and the DNC and it’s corrupt hacks would never have been openly challenged.

      In that light, there really was no downside for Sanders in supporting Hillary. And with endorsing Hillary, Bernie stood the chance of hitting the political jackpot: a Trump win.

      With a Trump presidency, there will be no sitting Wall Street Democrat in the White House. A real possibility exists that the stranglehold that Wall Street hacks have had on the DNC may be broken.

      There are more rank-and-file progressive Democrats than there are rank-and-file Wall Street Democrats. More liberals than neo-liberals. More leftists than there are oligarchs.

      The reason progressives do not control the party is because Wall Street lobbyists have purchased our elected Democratic leaders.

      They owned Obama, Biden, Reid, Pelosi, almost every Member of Congress and the Senate. In turn, those bought-and-paid-for Wall Street sycophants appointed DNC operatives, who appointed super-delegates, who stole the election from Bernie Sanders.

      Some of us disagree with Bernie, some are skeptical of his strategy.

      Bernie is the leader of those who will follow him. And most Berners will follow Bernie.

      The immediate task at hand is to help Bernie take over the Democratic party.

      And that is really the only option available to progressives. Every other course of action is a waste of time, energy, and resources. Third parties, petitioning Bernie to fall on his sword, howling at the moon, etc, accomplish nothing.

      For those in the Democratic party, let’s get to work on Bernie’s revolution.

      For those outside the party, #DemEnter.

      For those who disagree, let’s set aside our differences for the next 3 years and get Bernie Sanders (or one of his political heirs) the Democratic nomination.

      Animal activists and environmentalists have a more compelling interest in replacing Trump with a progressive in 2020 than do any others. That is because most of the Trump opposition is not progressive. Corporate and centrist Democrats, establishment Republicans, free trade lobbyists, multinational corporations, and many in the military-industrial complex are avowed enemies of Donald Trump. And those enemies do not give a damn about animals or the environment.

      Replacing Trump with a Wall Street Democrat in 2020 would accomplish nothing for the animals or the environment. Merely joining the chorus of Trump critics is counter-productive for progressives, animal activists, and environmentalists. The cacophony of those screaming about Trump is drowning out those who are pointing out that Hillary and the Democrats are responsible for Trump.

      The Democratic leadership could not be more transparent. By creating public hysteria about Trump, even the Wall Street hacks who run the Democratic party will appear progressive in comparison.

      The Democratic leadership hopes to unite rank-and-file Democrats on women’s issues and immigration, and to thus nominate another Wall Street Whore in 2020. They hope to divert the attention of the rank-and-file from the chasm that exists between progressives and Wall Street Democrats.

      The fact that the Democratic establishment opposes universal healthcare, which progressives support.

      That Wall street Democrats support corporate welfare, which progressives oppose.

      That Wall Street Democrats support corporate funding of campaigns and gifts to public officials, which progressives oppose..

      That Wall Street Democrats support fracking, pipelines, Arctic drilling, mining on public lands, etc, all of which progressives oppose.

      That Wall street Democrats support regime changes, the killing of civilians by drones, bombing of countries we are not at war with, etc. All of which progressives oppose.


      • Agreed. But the leaders of the Democrats are getting a little old to be playing the long game. Don’t we need to focus on finding younger and more promising candidates? We keep going back to the same politicians and tinkering around the edges of the same failed ideas.

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.